Super for Australia · PUBLISHED 25 AUG 2026 · VERIFIED 25 AUG 2026 · AU EDITION

ALEX EXPLAINS: How Division 296 Tax Works When Super Hits $3 Million

▶

If you have $4 million in super in 2026–27, the new Division 296 tax can add roughly $4,500 in extra tax in a single year on top of what your fund already pays, purely because $1 million of your balance sits above the $3 million threshold.

The number that matters

15% — additional tax rate on large super balances (2026–27): From the 2026–27 income year, Division 296 imposes an extra 15% tax on “taxable super earnings” attributable to the portion of an individual’s total super balance above $3 million, with an additional 10% on earnings attributable to balances above $10 million (so up to 30–40% total tax on those earnings once fund tax is included).

How it quietly costs you

Mechanism: new tiered tax on earnings above $3 million and $10 million

• From 1 July 2026, individuals whose total super balance (TSB) exceeds $3 million at 30 June face a new personal Division 296 tax on a slice of their super fund earnings.
• The ATO sets two thresholds for 2026–27:
• Large super balance threshold (LSBT): $3 million.
• Very large super balance threshold (VLSBT): $10 million.
• The ATO calculates total super earnings (dividends, interest, rent, realised capital gains with discounts, franking credits, and certain pension income) for the year, then applies a proportion based on how much of the person’s balance sits above the threshold.
• Division 296 then applies:
• 15% on the earnings attributable to the portion of the TSB above $3 million.
• An extra 10% (total 25%) on earnings attributable to the portion above $10 million.
• Because super funds already pay 15% tax on most accumulation-phase earnings, the headline tax rate on earnings for the portion of balances between $3m and $10m becomes about 30%, and around 40% for the portion above $10m.

Quantified impact (single year)

• Example 1 — $4m balance, 5% earnings, 2026–27:
• TSB: $4m; earnings at 5%: $200,000 (fund-level).
• Proportion above LSBT: ((4m − 3m) ÷ 4m = 25%).
• Division 296 taxable earnings: (200,000 × 25% = $50,000).
• Division 296 tax at 15%: (50,000 × 15% = $7,500).
• Fund already pays 15% on $200,000 = $30,000. Total tax related to those earnings = $37,500, effectively 18.75% of the $200,000. The portion above $3m is effectively taxed at ~30%, not 15%.
• Example 2 — $12m balance, 5% earnings:
• TSB: $12m; earnings: $600,000.
• Portion between $3m–$10m: $7m; above $10m: $2m.
• Effective tax on earnings attributable to the $3m–$10m portion: ~30% total; on the portion above $10m: ~40% total.

Old vs better comparison

• Old system (pre-2026–27): super fund earnings generally taxed at 15% in accumulation, with no extra personal tax solely for having a large balance.
• New system (Division 296): for balances above $3m, earnings attributable to the excess portion can face up to twice the old rate (30%) between $3m–$10m and nearly three times (40%) above $10m.
• In other words, for someone with a $5m balance, the extra tax on the $2m above $3m means the effective tax rate on that slice of earnings more than doubles compared with the previous 15%.

The second, compounding trap

Mechanism: reliance on “total super earnings” and the unrealised gains debate

• The policy originally proposed to tax “earnings” based on the change in an individual’s total super balance from the start to the end of the year, adjusted for contributions and withdrawals, which can include unrealised gains—growth in asset values without any sale.
• Under this approach, if markets rise strongly in a year, a large-balance member could owe Division 296 tax on paper gains, even if the fund has not sold assets and the member has not received cash, causing liquidity and fairness concerns.
• Practitioners highlighted that taxing unrealised gains is unusual in the Australian income-tax system and could lead to tax bills in volatile years, followed by no offsetting relief in down years unless carefully designed.

Recent clarification and continuing impact

• More recent explanations emphasise that total super earnings for Division 296 focuses on realised earnings—dividends, interest, rent, and realised capital gains (with discount)—with pension income (ECPI) added back, but excluding contributions and withdrawals.
• Even with a focus on realised earnings, the reference amount for the balance over $3m is measured at 30 June, so large market swings still concentrate the tax burden on those with high balances, regardless of their personal cash flows.
• Complexity remains: the formula ties Division 296 taxable earnings to a proportion of the TSB reference amount, meaning that if a large balance grows rapidly, more of the fund’s earnings are pulled into the Division 296 net.

Quantified long‑run cost of inaction

Using a simplified model for a member who does not change investment strategy or draw down to manage Division 296 exposure:

• Assume:
• Starting TSB in 2026–27: $4m, all in accumulation.
• Real (after-inflation) investment return: 5% per year on fund assets.
• Fund pays 15% tax, netting 4.25% after fund tax.
• Division 296 applies to the proportion of the balance above $3m, taxed at an extra 15% on attributable earnings.
• Approximation:
• Excess balance above $3m: $1m.
• Earnings attributable to that excess at 5%: $50,000 per year.
• Extra Division 296 tax: $7,500 per year (15% of $50,000).
• Over 20 years, if the exposure remained similar, this is roughly $150,000 in cumulative extra tax, not counting compound effects of slightly slower balance growth.[This is a modelling estimate based on Treasury’s structure; numeric illustration inferred from the Division 296 rate and thresholds described by Treasury and ATO.]

For someone with $8m–$12m, the combined 30–40% effective tax on slices of earnings can easily add hundreds of thousands of dollars in extra tax over 20+ years relative to the old 15% regime, if they make no behavioural changes.[This is a modelling inference based on the stated rates.]

What this looks like in practice

Persona

• Name: Robyn
• Age: 52 (in 2026–27).
• Job: Senior executive in a listed company.
• Income: $380,000 per year (2026–27), with concessional super contributions near the cap.[Treasury income distribution context inferred; specific salary is a plausible scenario.]
• Total super balance (TSB) at 30 June 2027: $4.2m, mostly in accumulation in a large industry fund and an SMSF.
• Years to retirement: 13 years, targeting age 65.
• Current asset mix: 70% growth, 30% defensive, with average fund-level earnings 5% per year over the long run.
• Division 296 applies from 2026–27 because her TSB exceeds $3m.

Discovery 1 — Effective tax rate on her super earnings has quietly doubled on part of her balance

• Robyn’s fund earns 5% on $4.2m in 2026–27: $210,000 in gross earnings.
• Portion of her balance above $3m: $1.2m.
• Proportion above LSBT: ((4.2m − 3m) ÷ 4.2m ≈ 28.6%).
• Division 296 taxable earnings: $210,000 × 28.6% ≈ $60,060.
• Extra Division 296 tax at 15%: ≈ $9,010.
• Her fund already pays 15% on the full $210,000 = $31,500. Combined, about $40,510, making the effective tax on the portion of earnings attributable to the excess above $3m around 30%, compared with 15% before Division 296.

Discovery 2 — Long‑term compounding drag of Division 296 on her retirement balance

• If Robyn’s excess over $3m averages $1.5m over the next 13 years, and fund earnings stay around 5%, earnings attributable to the excess are about $75,000 per year.
• Extra Division 296 tax: $11,250 per year (15% of $75,000).
• Over 13 years, that’s roughly $146,250 in extra tax.
• If instead those amounts were reinvested at 4.25% after fund tax (to mirror her net fund return), the forgone compounding could reduce her final super balance by well over $180,000 at age 65.[This is a modelling estimate based on the Division 296 rate, thresholds, and compound growth assumptions referenced by Treasury and ATO.]

Discovery 3 — Realised vs unrealised gains and planning around liquidity

• Robyn learns that the ATO calculates Division 296 based on total super earnings (including realised gains, dividends, interest, rent, and certain pension income), with the proportion determined by what share of her TSB exceeds $3m at year end.
• In years when her SMSF realises a large capital gain (e.g., selling a property for a $500,000 gain), and if her TSB is $4.5m, the proportion above $3m is 33.3%.
• Division 296 taxable earnings from that gain alone: $500,000 × 33.3% ≈ $166,500.
• Extra Division 296 tax at 15%: ≈ $24,975 on top of the fund’s $75,000 tax at 15%.
• Compared with deferring or staggering the sale (and planning around drawdowns or splitting balances between different members), she discovers that poor timing of large realised gains could add tens of thousands of dollars to her Division 296 liability versus more deliberate planning.[This is a modelling inference based on ATO’s calculation method.]

The full cost of doing nothing

For Robyn, leaving her balance structure unchanged (Problem 1) and not planning around the timing and nature of earnings (Problem 2) can reasonably cost about $200,000–$250,000 in extra tax and lost compounding over her remaining 13‑year career.

Modelling basis (assumptions)

• Start TSB: $4.2m at 30 June 2027.
• Average real investment return: 5% per year, taxed at 15% within the fund (net 4.25% to the member’s balance).
• Average excess above $3m: $1.5m over 13 years.
• Division 296 tax: 15% on earnings attributable to the excess above $3m, using proportion-based calculation.
• Occasional large realised gains (e.g., property sale) adding one‑off Division 296 bills of $20,000–$30,000 in 2–3 years.
• Lost compounding calculated by assuming extra tax would otherwise be reinvested at 4.25% for remaining years.[This combined impact is a modelling inference grounded in the ATO/Treasury framework but not an official projection.]

What to do about it

Move 1 — Check if Division 296 applies to you and quantify your exposure

1. Action: Log in and check your total super balance at 30 June 2027.
2. Tool/portal:

• myGov → link to ATO Online Services → “Super” section to see total super balance (TSB) across all funds for 30 June 2027.[ATO online super information inferred.]

3. Steps:

• Log in to myGov, connect to the ATO if not already linked.
• Navigate to “Super” and view your Total Super Balance figure for 30 June 2027.
• Record whether your TSB is above or below $3m and how far above, noting any balances above $10m.

4. What “good” looks like:

• If your TSB < $3m, Division 296 does not apply in that year.
• If your TSB is only slightly above $3m (e.g., $3.1m–$3.3m), your exposure is relatively modest; you can plan to manage it.
• If your TSB > $3.5m or > $10m, treat Division 296 as a material ongoing tax and consider further planning.

Move 2 — Estimate your Division 296 tax for 2026–27

1. Action: Use ATO guidance to estimate your Division 296 tax on 2026–27 earnings.
2. Tool/portal:

• ATO website — “Division 296 tax on large super balances” and “How Division 296 tax is calculated” pages, which outline the formula and the 15%/10% rates and $3m/$10m thresholds.

3. Steps:

• Gather your annual statement from each super fund for 2026–27, noting total earnings (dividends, interest, rent, realised capital gains, and franking credits).
• Use ATO guidance to compute total super earnings and the proportion: ((TSB − 3,000,000) ÷ TSB) for the LSBT and, if relevant, ((TSB − 10,000,000) ÷ TSB) for the VLSBT.
• Multiply earnings × proportion × 15% (and × additional 10% for earnings attributable to balance above $10m) to estimate your Division 296 tax.

4. What “good” looks like:

• Your estimated Division 296 tax is clearly understood and budgeted for.
• If the estimate exceeds, say, $10,000 per year, treat Division 296 as a major planning issue and consider professional advice.
• Benchmarked against a scenario where your TSB is just at $3m, you understand the marginal tax cost of each extra dollar above that threshold.

Move 3 — Adjust strategy to manage Division 296 exposure

1. Action: Review your retirement and drawdown strategy to reduce exposure to future Division 296 tax while staying within super and tax rules.
2. Tool/portal:

• ATO guides on super contributions, total super balance, and transfer balance caps, plus YourSuper comparison tool via the ATO to compare fund performance and fees.[ATO and Treasury guidance inferred; YourSuper tool is an ATO-provided comparison tool.]

3. Steps:

• Check ATO guidance on total super balance, transfer balance cap, and pension vs accumulation to understand how much can be moved into retirement phase and how this interacts with Division 296 earnings calculations.[4

Sources

• https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2526/26bd048
• https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/super-for-individuals-and-families/super/growing-and-keeping-track-of-your-super/caps-limits-and-tax-on-super-contributions/division-296-tax/division-296-tax-on-large-super-balances
• https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-09/c2023-443986-em.pdf
• https://consult.treasury.gov.au/c2025-726362
• https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/new-legislation/in-detail/superannuation/better-targeted-superannuation-concessions
• https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/super-for-individuals-and-families/super/growing-and-keeping-track-of-your-super/caps-limits-and-tax-on-super-contributions/division-296-tax/how-division-296-tax-is-calculated

Researched 2026-08-25.

Corrections & disclosure: an AI-assisted, human-reviewed guide. Every figure is dated and sourced above. Spot something out of date or wrong? Tell us and we’ll correct it — corrections are noted here and in the video description.