The Fine Print Australia · PUBLISHED 27 JUN 2026 · VERIFIED 27 JUN 2026 · AU EDITION

Is Your Super in One of Australia's Worst Funds for 2026? 🇦🇺

Watch on YouTube — The Fine Print Australia

A worker on $70,000 with 25 years to retirement can end up about $100,000 worse off by staying in an underperforming super product instead of a stronger one, based on APRA’s performance-test failures and long-run modelling of return gaps and fees.

The number that matters

7 superannuation products failed APRA’s most recent performance test, and Finder identifies them as the worst super funds in Australia for 2026.

How it quietly costs you

The first hidden cost is persistent underperformance: APRA’s annual performance test is designed to catch products whose net returns lag the benchmark, but funds can still remain open long enough for members to keep losing compounding growth.

The quantified impact is that the failed products are the ones APRA says did not deliver sufficient net investment performance over a seven-year test period, and Canstar’s explanation of the APRA heatmap shows members should use the seven-year net investment return column and compare it directly with APRA’s pass/fail benchmark.

Old vs better: Finder’s 2026 list shows the problem is concentrated in a small set of products that failed APRA, while no MySuper funds failed in 2025, which matters because most Australians are in MySuper products.

The second, compounding trap

The second layer is fees and transaction costs, which compound the damage even when returns are mediocre rather than disastrous.

A practical benchmark comes from the fee comparison in the 2026 super-fund analysis: AustralianSuper’s balanced option had 0.49% in investment fees and costs plus 0.08% in transaction costs, for a total of 0.57% p.a., while indexed alternatives in the same market were described as ranging from 0.04% to 0.12%.

Over decades, that fee gap becomes a long-run drag because every extra percentage point taken in costs is money that does not compound in the account; the result is materially lower retirement balances even if gross market returns are similar.

What this looks like in practice

Megan, 39, admin manager, $78,000 salary, $112,000 super balance, MySuper balanced option, 26 years to retirement.

She would discover:

The full cost of doing nothing

For Megan, combining underperformance and higher fees can plausibly reduce retirement savings by well over $100,000 over a full career, using a modelling basis of a mid-income worker, regular super contributions, 26 years of compounding, and a persistent fee/performance gap between a failed or weak product and a lower-fee indexed alternative.

What to do about it

A myth worth clearing up

Myth: “If my super fund is big and well-known, it probably can’t be one of the worst.”

Fact: APRA’s performance test can still flag major products, and Finder’s 2026 list shows multiple named products failing the latest test; size and brand name do not guarantee strong net returns.

Sources

Researched 2026-06-27.


Corrections & disclosure: an AI-assisted, human-reviewed guide. Every figure is dated and sourced above. Spot something out of date or wrong? Tell us and we’ll correct it — corrections are noted here and in the video description.

The Fine Print

Last verified: 27 JUN 2026
This content is general information only and does not take your personal circumstances into account. It is not financial advice. Consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser.
Our correction policy: errors are pinned on the video and logged at /corrections/. No silent edits.

Deadlines don't email you. We do.

One short note when a deadline or figure that affects your money changes — Medicare enrollment, tax thresholds, contribution caps. No spam, no daily digest, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll only email you about deadline and figure changes. Privacy policy applies.